AGRI-PROFILE: PINAMALAYAN

Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro

Pinamalayan is a first-class municipality located in the eastern part of the province of Oriental Mindoro, Mindoro Island. It is approximately 71 kilometers away from the provincial capital of Calapan City and 254 kilometers away from the national capital of Manila. Based on the certification by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), it has an estimated total land area of 28,226 hectares comprised by 37 barangays. These are further classified into eight urban barangays and 29 rural barangays. Furthermore, there are ten coastal barangays. Among all the barangays, Sabang has the largest land area at 8,799.20 hectares while Zone IV has the smallest land area at 10.65 hectares.

According to the PSA, Pinamalayan has a total population of 86,172 with a growth rate of 1.03 percent. Total number of households is at 19,276 based on the CBMS Survey (2014). It is the most populous municipality after Calapan City and Naujan. Out of the 37 barangays, Marfrancisco is the most populous followed by Papandayan which is expected to be the most populous barangay in the coming years. The level of urbanization increased in the last 25 years. In 2000, 2010, and 2015, the urbanization level of Pinamalayan was higher than the provincial level.

.

Farming

The existing land use shows that about 16,904.2 hectares or 60% of the municipal land is utilized for various crops and fruit-bearing trees (Map Q). The top agricultural crops in terms of area utilization and annual production are as follows: rice, banana, coconut, fruit trees, and vegetables.

Over the course of history, agriculture is an important economic activity in the municipality. Furthermore, its crops have a product market that reaches up to the neighboring provinces of Cavite, Batangas, Marinduque and Romblon, as well as the national capital of Manila. It also has a market in the Visayas, particularly in Iloilo. The main cash crop is rice, for it has the greatest annual production and largest generated income.

As summarized in the succeeding graphs, the general trend of area utilization (Figure EC-1), annual production (Figure EC-2), and annual generated values (Figure EC-3) have slightly increased in the years 2014 to 2015. However, all of the production volumes and generated revenues of major crops for the year 2016 have decreased drastically, compared to that of the 2014 and 2015 values.



Furthermore, it is notable that the data on bananas were both of zero yield (Figure EC-2) and revenue in 2016 (Figure EC-3). This trend has been attributed to the heavy damages brought upon by Typhoon Nona which struck Pinamalayan in the latter part of 2015. Hence, the decrease in overall agricultural productivity in the following year of 2016 was observed. For the complete set of data, refer to Appendices D, E, and F.



According to interviews, one of the crops that has potential to be developed is the abaca or Manila Hemp. This plant is mostly grown on the higher elevations of the municipality but the trend cannot be observed because of the lack of data for the years 2014 to 2015. In 2016, the area utilized for such crop was at 86 hectares, with a yield of 15 metric tons and more than one million pesos in revenues.

Looking into the historical data for both agricultural land utilization and volume of production, an inverted relationship was observed between 2014 and 2015. While the total land utilization increased by 0.01 percent, production decreased by 7.42 percent (Table EC-1). Between 2015 to 2016, however, the decrease in agricultural areas and production became even more evident for there was a 7.79 percent decrease in area utilization and 35.66 percent decrease in production (Table EC-2). The results for each major crop is also shown in the said tables.

Table EC-1. Comparative Agricultural Crop Areas and Production, Year 2014 to 2015 Major Crops Area (hectares) Volume of Production
Major Crops Area (hectares) Volume of Production (MT)
2014 2015 % Increase/
Decrease
2014 2015 % Increase/
Decrease
Rice 7,883.50 7,946.00 ↑0.79% 38,615.98 38,876.78 ↑0.68%
Banana 2,346.51 2,325.64 ↓0.04% 16,442.79 12,064.04 ↓26.63%
Fruit Trees 643.26 581.32 ↓9.63% 2,658.81 2,977.47 ↑11.99%
Vegetables 121.07 143.07 ↑18.18% 1,758.17 1,146.42 ↓34.79%
Coconut 955.85 955.85 0.00% 1,182.71 1,182.71 0.00%
TOTAL 11,950.18 11,951.88 ↑0.01% 59,475.75 55,064.71 ↓7.42%
Source: Municipal Agriculture Office of Pinamalayan (2017), Philippine Coconut Authority (2017)
Table EC-2. Comparative Agricultural Areas and Production, Year 2015 to 2016
Major Crops Area (hectares) Volume of Production (MT)
2014 2016 % Increase/
Decrease
2014 2016 % Increase/
Decrease
Rice 7,946.00 7,494.82 ↓5.68% 38,876.78 34,771.29 ↓10.56%
Banana 2,325.64 2,186.04 ↓6.00% 12,064.04 0.00 ↓100%
Fruit Trees 581.32 474.96 ↓18.30% 2,977.00 13.89 ↓99.53%
Vegetables 143.07 120.36 ↓15.87% 1,146.42 493.60 ↓56.94%
Coconut 955.85 744.66 ↓22.09% 1,182.71 911.20 ↓22.96%
TOTAL 11,951.88 11,020.84 ↓7.79% 55,064.71 36,189.98 ↓34.28%
Source: Municipal Agriculture Office (2017), Philippine Coconut Authority (2017)

In 2014 and 2015, the greatest productivity per area were that of vegetables at 14.52 and 8.01 metric tons per hectare, respectively. While in 2016, rice had the most yield per area at 4.64 metric tons per hectare (Table EC-3).

But as displayed by Figure EC-4, the yield of coconuts and rice for the past three years has almost remained constant, while the yield for bananas, fruit trees, and vegetables have sharply decreased. All of these values, however, are showing declining productivity.

Table EC-2. Comparative Agricultural Areas and Production, Year 2015 to 2016
Major Crops 2014 2015 2016
Rice 4.90 4.89 4.64
Banana 7.07 5.19 0.00
Fruit Trees 4.13 5.12 0.03
Vegetables 14.52 8.01 4.10
Coconut 1.24 1.24 1.22
Abaca 0.12
Source: Municipal Agriculture Office (2017)



Increasing the land utilized for agriculture alone may not be a good strategy to increase overall agricultural production. Since typhoon occurrence is a major factor that can influence the level of production, it might be better to consider shifting cropping patterns combined with expanding land area for agricultural utilization. Since climate change is also expected to bring more hostile conditions for farming, sustainable production practices should also be supported, studied, and promoted. Availability of post-harvest facilities is of course given.

As of the 2014 CBMS, 20 percent of households are engaged in agriculture. Barangay Sabang has the largest percent share of households at 78 percent while the least percent share of households comes from barangays Wawa and Zone II, with both at one percent. Other pertinent data per barangay are presented by Table EC-4.

Barangay Number of Households Households Engaged in Agriculture
Number Percent Share (%)
Anoling 444 108 24%
Bacungan 340 41 12%
Bangbang 235 86 37%
Banilad 457 153 33%
Buli 331 109 33%
Cacawan 1016 110 11%
Calingag 456 151 33%
Del Razon 375 52 14%
Guinhawa 500 117 23%
Inclanay 344 61 18%
Lumambayan 658 32 5%
Malaya 167 71 43%
Maliangcog 339 125 37%
Maningcol 418 95 23%
Marayos 398 177 44%
Marfrancisco 1,359 73 5%
Nabuslot 604 124 21%
Pagalagala 307 76 25%
Palayan 421 82 19%
Pambisan Malaki 413 123 30%
Pambisan Munti 254 98 39%
Panggulayan 586 126 22%
Papandayan 1,338 93 7%
Pili 800 203 25%
Quinabigan 502 58 12%
Ranzo 225 79 35%
Rosario 353 42 12%
Sabang 686 532 78%
Sta. Isabel 570 246 43%
Sta. Maria 321 90 28%
Sta. Rita 674 118 18%
Sto. Niño 274 39 14%
Wawa 1123 10 1%
Zone I 680 15 2%
Zone II 625 8 1%
Zone III 475 28 6%
Zone IV 208 45 22%
TOTAL 19,276 3,796 20%
Source: CBMS Survey (2014)

Table EC-5 shows a summary of the water irrigation system present in the municipality. The NIA-Pula-Bansud River Irrigation System (RIS) has been operating since 1960. Since then, several rehabilitation works were taken through the Irrigation Operation Support Project (IOSP). It diverts the water through a run-off type river dam located across the Pula River in barangay Inclanay. The system currently serves 18 barangays in Pinamalayan, two in Socorro, and another two in Pola. It is also reported that the existing irrigation facilities inadequately supplies water in some areas, resulting to adverse effects in production. Thus, it is recommended that canals should be rehabilitated, as well as to concretize existing farm ditch canals. See Appendix G for the irrigation map from NIA.

Table EC-5. Water Irrigation System
Irrigation System Date Constructed Type of
Ownership
Type of
Type of Irrigation
Type of
Capacity of Irrigation System (m3/day)
Type of
Location
(Barangay)
Pula RIS December 15, 1960 Public Diversion Dam and Checkgate 324,000 Inclanay

According to GIS estimations, there is 948.60 hectares of mixed agricultural areas with irrigation canals (Maps R). This was done by overlaying the existing mixed agricultural areas against the irrigation system, with 50 meters buffer area on each side of the canals. This means that these lands can be further developed into rice production areas. The summary of areas per barangay is shown by Table EC-6. The largest area coverage is at barangay Pambisan Malaki with 157.83 hectares while the smallest area coverage is at barangay Zone I with 0.29 hectares.

Table EC-6. Mixed Agricultural Areas with Irrigation, Year 2017
Barangay Mixed agricultural areas with irrigation (ha)
Anoling 53.95
Bacungan 85.59
Bangbang 57.43
Buli 1.11
Cacawan 12.41
Calingag 53.02
Inclanay 29.51
Maningcol 33.00
Marfrancisco 20.76
Nabuslot 85.14
Pagalagala 60.83
Palayan 28.66
Pambisan Malaki 157.83
Panggulayan 49.49
Papandayan 74.83
Rosario 6.82
Sta. Maria 64.06
Sta. Rita 30.24
Sto. Nino 43.63
Zone I 0.29
TOTAL 948.60
Source: Municipal Agriculture Office and GIS computations (2017)

1